Olympic Village Project Management Essay Example for Free

surpassing sm every last(predicate) town Project Management EssayOn July 6 2005, the International surpassing Committee announced the designation of London as the host of the 2012 Olympic Games. 8 days later, the Olympic Bill was introduced to the Parliament, allowing the launch of lottery scratch cards in order to fund the Games. In the education of the reception of the Games, the city of London started a big renovation plan that came with the reflection of several infrastructures. Among them was the Olympic village.Before ExecutionPresentationThe Olympic Village had the most spacious accommodation in the tarradiddle of the Games, with ample way to house the 16,000 athletes and NOC team asideicials in 17,320 beds, and with the capacity to add more if required. The Olympic Village was conveniently situated in the midst of most sports venues. The great majority of competitors (80% of Olympic athletes and over 95% of Paralympic athletes) bequeath be at heart 20 minutes of their venues. Though unified in design, the Olympic Village had distinct residential and international zones in strict accord with IOC Olympic Village guidelines. The international zone, located north of Stratford International station, comprises athletes entertainment and leisure facilities, the visitors welcome centre, the media sub-centre, meeting rooms and conference facilities and areas for the Welcome Ceremonies and signal displays. The residential zone contains the apartments, the main dining facility and the polyclinic.Adjacent buildings houses various services including athlete accreditation, sports information, the NOC centre, the Olympic Village operations and service area (VOSA), the athletes disco and the Chef de Mission meeting hall. The transport mall was dissipate into two main areas. One served the Olympic Park and the other provided transit to other London contest venues. As the Games progressed, bus services operated from here to Londons key tourist venues. Transport within the Olympic Village itself was provided by a zero-emission continuous bus shuttle to connect apartment blocks with all the main facilities, including the transport mall and dining facilities. This service ran on a continuous 24-hour basis, although on a reduced basis during the early hours of the morning (01.00hrs to 05.00hrs). The Olympic Villages main entrance is at the southern end of the complex, close to Stratford International station and the main vehicle pickup/drop off facility. Secure car parking for accredited guests and visiting officials volition be nearby.ScheduleGiven the sizing and the nature of the project, the LOCOG (London Organizing Committee of the Olympic Games) and the ODA (Olympic Delivery Authority) did not wait for the IOC decision to begin the project of the construction of an Olympic Village. As we bay window see on the table below, the organizations started, since 2003, the ground take shape for the athletes accommodation. By the time t he IOC gave its verdict, the fixing was chosen and the designing details were already on their way. As the soon as the decision was make public, the tendering for the main contractor began. Shortly after, the construction on- post started with the demolition phase. The construction of the Village was completed in early 2012 for a total duration on-site of almost 6 years.LocationThe area chosen as the construction site was located in east London, seven minutes from all of the attractions of the city centre and in the heart of the Olympic Park. This location is part of the development project of Stratford City. Stratford City will bring almost 5 000 homes and 30 000 jobs to Stratford and has been given outline planning consent. The project, once completed, will be one of the largest mixed use developments in the UK for many years. It is the brainchild of development partners Chelsfield plc, Stanhope plc and London and Continental Railways. The plans embroil 465,000 square meters of offices, 4,850 new homes for approximately 11,000 people, 150,500 square meters of retail space and up to 2,000 hotel bedrooms. Work began in 2006 and is pass judgment to take 20 years to complete.EnvironmentalIn early 2003, the governmental organizations carried a full environmental impact assessment as part of the Olympic masterplan planning applications. This environmental assessment considered existing site conditions, potential impacts of Olympic developments on the site and its surroundings, as well as opportunities for environmental management, awareness-raising and cultural activities. The studies and temperance proposals have formed the basis for a detailed environmental brief for the Olympic Village. It includes Application of the highest recognised UK standards for sustainable construction to meet carbon emission and gaga minimization targets Climate-proofing to take account of predicted clime changes in the decades ahead An integrated approach to resource manageme nt and infrastructure development for energy, water and waste Emphasis on access, mobility and community services infrastructure to reduce car dependency and promote fitter lifestyles High soundscape quality and a legacy of exemplary noise management practices with supportive soundscapes for people with visual and hearing impairments Incorporation of green space and biodiversity into the design to provide ecological, water management, air quality and visual amenity benefits.Paralympic considerationsBecause the Village also welcomed the athletes participating in the Paralympic Games, the service providers were asked to make necessary adjustments to the physical features of their expound to allow equal access for all in accordance with the UKs Building Regulations. The LOCOG will consider that the Paralympic Village will meet any new standards agreed with the IPC, such as single room accommodation for every athlete with a severe disability (such as those who use an electric whe elchair for occasional living). Every apartment will benefit from spacious bathrooms and shower rooms. Because the Paralympic Village will be specifically designed to be accessible, the IPC and the NPCs will for the first time be able to indicate in arouse where any special aids and facilities should be located.Costs planningThe construction costs were planned to orbital cavity $ 1 101 million for a 5 years project (from June 2007 to May 2012). As we can see on the table below, almost the total of that sum has been used for the main construction work of the site. The LOCOG financed the temporary works for an amount of 61 million. Those temporary workers, employed in early 2012, were given the designate to tune up the Village (equipping it with furnitures). The financing of the permanent workers for an amount of more than a billion pounds will be discussed in the next point.