An Argument For Animal Research :: essays research papers

An Argument For Animal ResearchMedicine has come a very long expression since the days when men intaked to punctureholes into the skull to release tension or evil spirits. In the last onehundred years, for the sake of humanity, numerous vaccinations defecate beendeveloped, disease and disorders of all types have been prevented, surgicaltechniques have been advanced, drugs have been developed to cure ailments andthe list continues endlessly. The progress that has been achieved in knowledgeas well as safety in medical practice is correlated directly to wildcat research.It is one argument to control animal research so that needless closing of animalsare not rendered, but it is absolutely different to argue that animals haverights which supersede human subsistence. "For most of the past decade, theanimal-rights movement hasnt merely opposed animal research it hastried to destroy it." ( The Wall Street Journal, "Animals and illness", Page378.) Animal rights advocate s and activists generally have ethical objectionsregarding treatment of animals during experimentation, but the use of animals inresearch for the benefit of all people is and always will be justifiable.Over 99 portion of all animal experiments are on rats and mice developedexpressly for laboratory use. "Less than 1 percent of experiments involve cats,dogs, farm animals, nonhuman primates, frogs, fish, and birds." ( Encyclopediaof Medicine, AMA, "Animal Experimentation", Page 110.) Animal rights advocates experiment to sway public opinion by showing grotesque pictures of destroyed cats, dogs,farm animals, dolphins, and monkeys which account for less than 1 percent of theexperiments, yet it seems 99 percent of their advertising and campaigning dealwith this one percent. At least the American public realizes even those whoportray ethical righteousness can be wrong. For instance, " an American MedicalAssociation ( AMA ) poll found that 77 percent of adults think tha t usinganimals in medical research is necessary." ( The Wall Street Journal, "Animalsand Sickness", Page 378.)It is a curious thing to see animal welfare groups try to hinder animalresearch by threatening researchers lives and destroying years of info collected.Animal rights groups are promoting even more animal testing because the sametests will have to be repeated to replace the lost data. In all(prenominal) major medicalresearch university there have been some form of nuisance to deter animaltesting whether it was a quiet riot or endangering the lives of researchers.Animal rights groups must realize research is done out of necessity forhuman welfare. Whenever possible alternatives to animal experiments are used."The development of modern research techniques, much(prenominal) as CAT scans, PET scans,