Literature Review How to write

writings round off How to draw up BY Ravit*G1 article 1 Writing a Literature Review What is a Literature Review? A belles-lettres redirect examination is a survey and raillery of the belles-lettres in a given ara of study. It is a short overview of what has been studied, argued, and established about a topic, and it is usu in ally uprised chronologically or thematically. A books review is written in essay songat. It is not an annotated bibliography, because it groups related flora together and discusses trends and readings rather than focusing on integrity item at a conviction.It is not a summary rather, it evaluates prior and urrent look in regard to how relevant and/or utilitarian it is and how it relates to your experience search. A Literature Review is more than an Annotated Bibliography or a summary, because you ar organizing and presenting your sources in terms of their overall relationship to your own project. Purpose A literature review is written to highlight special(prenominal) arguments and ideas in a national of study. By highlighting these arguments, the writer attempts to show what has been studied in the field, and in like manner where the weaknesses, gaps, or atomic number 18as needing further study argon.The review should therefore also demonstrate to the reader why the riters look for is useful, necessary, important, and valid. Questions a Literature Review Should Answer Asking questions such as the pursueing pass on help oneself you sift through your sources and organize your literature review. Remember, the literature review organizes the antecedent enquiry in the light of what you are planning to do in your own project. Whats been done in this topic area to date? What are the hearty discoveries, key concepts, arguments, and/or theories that scholars have put forward? Which are the important works?On which accompaniment areas of the topic has foregoing research oncentrated? Have there been developments ov er time? What methodologies have been used? atomic number 18 there any gaps in the research? Are there areas that havent been looked at closely yet, but which should be? Are there new shipway of flavor at the topic? Are there improved methodologies for researching this quash? What future perpetrations should research in this caseful take? How will your research build on or de persona from current and previous research on the topic? What contribution will your research prove to the field?Length The length ofa literature review varies depending on its purpose and audience. In a hesis or dissertation, the review is usually a full chapter (at least(prenominal) 20 pages), but for an assignment it may only be a few pages. Structure There are several ways to organize and structure a literature review. Two common ways are chronologically and thematically. Chronological In a chronological review, you will group and discuss your sources in order of their appearance (usually publicatio n), highlighting the changes in research in the field and your specific topic over time.This method is useful for papers focusing on research methodology, historiographical papers, and other writing where time becomes an important lement. For example, a literature review on theories of mental distemper might present how the beneathstanding of mental illness has changed through the centuries, by giving a series of examples of key developments and ending with current theories and the direction your research will take. Thematic In a thematic review, you will group and discuss your sources in terms of the themes or topics they cover.This method is much a stronger one organizationally, and it can help you resist the urge to resume your sources. By grouping themes or topics of research together, you will e adapted to demonstrate the fictional characters of topics that are important to your research. For example, if the topic of the literature review is changes in popular music, then there might be separate sections on research involving the production of music, research on the dissemination of music, research on the interpretation of music, and historical studies of popular music.No matter which method you choose, remember inside each section of a literature review, it is important to discuss how the research relates to other studies (how is it similar or different, what other studies have been done, etc. as well as to demonstrate how it relates to your own work. This is what the review is for dont leave this connection out Source http//www. smu. ca/ administration/library/litrev. html denomination 2 Write a Literature Review 1.Introduction Not to be confused with a book review, a literature review surveys studious articles, books and other sources (e. g. dissertations, conference proceedings) relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory, providing a description, summary, and critical evaluation of each work. The purpose is to offer an over view of significant literature published on a topic. 2. Components Similar to primary research, development of the literature review requires four stages Problem formulationwhich topic or field is being examined and what are its component issues?Literature search purpose frameworks relevant to the subject being explored Data evaluationdetermining which literature makes a significant contribution to the understanding of the topic Analysis and interpretation discussing the findings and conclusions of pertinent literature Literature reviews should comprise the following elements An overview of the subject, issue or theory under consideration, along with the bjectives of the literature review Division of works under review into categories (e. g. hose in support of a particular position, those a sackst, and those offering alternative theses entirely) Explanation of how each work is similar to and how it varies from the others Conclusions as to which pieces are best considered in their a rgument, are most convert of their opinions, and make the greatest contribution to the understanding and development of their area of research In assessing each piece, consideration should be given to ProvenanceWhat are the authors credential? Are the authors arguments supported by evidence (e. . primary historical material, event studies, narratives, statistics, recent scientific findings)? Objectivityls the authors perspective even- handed or harmful? Is contrary data considered or is certain pertinent knowledge unheeded to prove the authors point? PersuasivenessWhich of the authors theses are most/least convincing? ValueAre the authors arguments and conclusions convincing? Does the work ultimately contribute in any significant way to an understanding of the subject? 3. Definition and intent/PurposeA literature review may constitute an essential chapter of a dissertation or dissertation, or may be a self-contained review of writings on a subject. In either case, its purpose is to plate each work in the context of its contribution to the understanding of the subject under review Describe the relationship of each work to the others under consideration Identify new ways to interpret, and shed light on any gaps in, previous research Resolve conflicts amongst seemingly contradictory previous studies Identify areas of prior scholarship to prevent duplication of effort predict the way forward for further researchPlace ones original work (in the case ot theses or dissertations) in the context ot existing literature The literature review itself, however, does not present new primary scholarship. http//library. ucsc. edu/help/howto/write-a-literature-review What is a review of the literature? A literature review is an account of what has been published on a topic by accredited scholars and researchers. Occasionally you will be asked to write one as a separate assignment (sometimes in the form of an annotated bibliographysee the bottom of the next page), but mo re often it is part of the introduction to an essay, research eport, or thesis.In writing the literature review, your purpose is to get to your reader what knowledge and ideas have been established on a topic, and what their strengths and weaknesses are. As a piece of writing, the literature review moldiness be specify by a guiding concept (e. g. , your research objective, the problem or issue you are discussing, or your argumentative thesis). It is not Just a descriptive list of the material available, or a set of summaries similarly enlarging your knowledge about the topic, writing a literature review lets you gain and demonstrate skills in two areas 1 . formation seeking the capability to scan the literature efficiently, using manual or computerized methods, to identify a set of useful articles and books 2. critical appraisal the ability to apply principles of compendium to identify unbiased and valid studies. A literature review must do these things 1 . be organized around and related in a flash to the thesis or research question you are developing 2. combine results into a summary of what is and is not known 3. identify areas of controversy in the literature 4. ormulate questions that need further research Ask yourself questions like these . What is the specific thesis, problem, or research question that my literature review helps to define? 2. What type of literature review am I conducting? Am I looking at issues of theory? methodology? policy? quantitative research (e. g. on the effectiveness of a new procedure)? qualitative research (e. g. , studies )? 3. What is the scope of my literature revie w? What types ot publications am I using (e. g. , Journals, books government documents, popular media)?What determine am I working in (e. g. , nursing psychology, sociology, medicine)? 4. How good was my information seeking? Has my search been wide enough to ensure Ive found all the relevant material? Has it been narrow enough to exclude irrelevant mate rial? Is the number of sources Ive used appropriate for the length of my paper? 5. Have I critically analysed the literature I use? Do I follow through a set of concepts and questions, comparing items to each other in the ways they deal with them?